Статья

Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition

K. Habersaat, C. Betsch, M. Danchin, C. Sunstein, R. Böhm, A. Falk, N. Brewer, S. Omer, M. Scherzer, S. Sah, E. Fischer, A. Scheel, D. Fancourt, S. Kitayama, E. Dubé, J. Leask, M. Dutta, N. MacDonald, A. Temkina, A. Lieberoth, M. Jackson, S. Lewandowsky, H. Seale, N. Fietje, P. Schmid, M. Gelfand, L. Korn, S. Eitze, L. Felgendreff, P. Sprengholz, C. Salvi, R. Butler,
2021

Governments around the world have implemented measures to manage the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While the majority of these measures are proving effective, they have a high social and economic cost, and response strategies are being adjusted. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that communities should have a voice, be informed and engaged, and participate in this transition phase. We propose ten considerations to support this principle: (1) implement a phased approach to a ‘new normal’; (2) balance individual rights with the social good; (3) prioritise people at highest risk of negative consequences; (4) provide special support for healthcare workers and care staff; (5) build, strengthen and maintain trust; (6) enlist existing social norms and foster healthy new norms; (7) increase resilience and self-efficacy; (8) use clear and positive language; (9) anticipate and manage misinformation; and (10) engage with media outlets. The transition phase should also be informed by real-time data according to which governmental responses should be updated. © 2020, Springer Nature Limited.

Цитирование

Похожие публикации

Источник

Версии

  • 1. Version of Record от 2021-04-27

Метаданные

Об авторах
  • K. Habersaat
    WHO Regional Office for Europe, Insights Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • C. Betsch
    Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
  • M. Danchin
    The University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Victoria, Australia
  • C. Sunstein
    Harvard University, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, United States
  • R. Böhm
    Department of Psychology, Department of Economics, and Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science (SODAS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • A. Falk
    University of Bonn and Institute on Behavior and Inequality (BRIQ), Bonn, Germany
  • N. Brewer
    Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
  • S. Omer
    Yale Institute for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Nursing, New Haven, CT, United States
  • M. Scherzer
    Cambridge Judge Business School, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • S. Sah
    Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
  • E. Fischer
    Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • A. Scheel
    Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
  • D. Fancourt
    Département d’Anthropologie, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
  • S. Kitayama
    Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • E. Dubé
    Center for Culture-Centered Approach to Research and Evaluation (CARE), Massey University, Aotearoa, New Zealand
  • J. Leask
    Department of Paediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
  • M. Dutta
    Department of Sociology, European University of St. Petersburg, St, Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • N. MacDonald
    Danish School of Education, Interacting Minds Center, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  • A. Temkina
    Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health and WHO Collaborating Centre on Culture and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
  • A. Lieberoth
    School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • M. Jackson
    University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
  • S. Lewandowsky
    School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • H. Seale
    Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
  • N. Fietje
    Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
  • P. Schmid
  • M. Gelfand
  • L. Korn
  • S. Eitze
  • L. Felgendreff
  • P. Sprengholz
  • C. Salvi
  • R. Butler
Название журнала
  • Nature Human Behaviour
Том
  • 4
Выпуск
  • 7
Страницы
  • 677-687
Ключевые слова
  • Betacoronavirus; communicable disease control; community participation; Coronavirus infection; government; health care personnel; human; interpersonal communication; pandemic; procedures; public policy; self concept; social norm; social stigma; trust; virus pneumonia; Betacoronavirus; Communicable Disease Control; Communication; Community Participation; Coronavirus Infections; Government; Health Personnel; Humans; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Public Policy; Self Efficacy; Social Norms; Social Stigma; Trust
Издатель
  • Nature Research
Тип документа
  • journal article
Источник
  • scopus