Статья

Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies

K. Eriksson, P. Strimling, M. Gelfand, J. Wu, J. Abernathy, C. Akotia, A. Aldashev, P. Andersson, G. Andrighetto, A. Anum, G. Arikan, Z. Aycan, F. Bagherian, D. Barrera, D. Basnight-Brown, B. Batkeyev, A. Belaus, E. Berezina, M. Björnstjerna, S. Blumen, P. Boski, F. Bou Zeineddine, I. Bovina, B. Huyen, J. Cardenas, Đ. Čekrlija, H. Choi, C. Contreras-Ibáñez, R. Costa-Lopes, M. de Barra, P. de Zoysa, A. Dorrough, N. Dvoryanchikov, A. Eller, J. Engelmann, H. Euh, X. Fang, S. Fiedler, O. Foster-Gimbel, M. Fülöp, R. Gardarsdottir, C. Gill, A. Glöckner, S. Graf, A. Grigoryan, V. Gritskov, K. Growiec, P. Halama, A. Hartanto, T. Hopthrow, M. Hřebíčková, D. Iliško, H. Imada, H. Kapoor, K. Kawakami, N. Khachatryan, N. Kharchenko, N. Khoury, T. Kiyonari, M. Kohút, L. Linh, L. Leslie, Y. Li, N. Li, Z. Li, K. Liik, A. Maitner, B. Manhique, H. Manley, I. Medhioub, S. Mentser, L. Mohammed, P. Nejat, O. Nipassa, R. Nussinson, N. Onyedire, I. Onyishi, S. Özden, P. Panagiotopoulou, L. Perez-Floriano, M. Persson, M. Pheko, A. Pirttilä-Backman, M. Pogosyan, J. Raver, C. Reyna, R. Rodrigues, S. Romanò, P. Romero, I. Sakki, A. San Martin, S. Sherbaji, H. Shimizu, B. Simpson, E. Szabo, K. Takemura, H. Tieffi, M. Mendes Teixeira, N. Thanomkul, H. Tiliouine, G. Travaglino, Y. Tsirbas, R. Wan, S. Widodo, R. Zein, Q. Zhang, L. Zirganou-Kazolea, P. Van Lange,
2021

Norm enforcement may be important for resolving conflicts and promoting cooperation. However, little is known about how preferred responses to norm violations vary across cultures and across domains. In a preregistered study of 57 countries (using convenience samples of 22,863 students and non-students), we measured perceptions of the appropriateness of various responses to a violation of a cooperative norm and to atypical social behaviors. Our findings highlight both cultural universals and cultural variation. We find a universal negative relation between appropriateness ratings of norm violations and appropriateness ratings of responses in the form of confrontation, social ostracism and gossip. Moreover, we find the country variation in the appropriateness of sanctions to be consistent across different norm violations but not across different sanctions. Specifically, in those countries where use of physical confrontation and social ostracism is rated as less appropriate, gossip is rated as more appropriate.

Цитирование

Похожие публикации

Документы

Версии

  • 1. Version of Record от 2021-03-05

Метаданные

Об авторах
  • K. Eriksson
    Center for Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
  • P. Strimling
    Institute for Futures Studies, Box 591, Stockholm, Sweden
  • M. Gelfand
    Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
  • J. Wu
    CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
  • J. Abernathy
    Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
  • C. Akotia
    Department of Psychology, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 84 Legon, Accra, Ghana
  • A. Aldashev
    New School of Economics, Satbayev University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • P. Andersson
    Center for Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  • G. Andrighetto
    Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden, Institute for Futures Studies, Box 591, Stockholm, Sweden, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, Rome, Italy
  • A. Anum
    Department of Psychology, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 84 Legon, Accra, Ghana
  • G. Arikan
    Department of Political Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
  • Z. Aycan
    Koç University, Rumelifeneri, Sarıyer Rumelifeneri Yolu, Istanbul, Turkey
  • F. Bagherian
    Department of Psychology and Education, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  • D. Barrera
    University of Turin and Collegio Carlo Alberto, Turin, Italy
  • D. Basnight-Brown
    United States International University – Africa, Box 14634 00800, Nairobi, Kenya
  • B. Batkeyev
    International School of Economics, Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A. Belaus
    Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), CABA, República Argentina, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Facultad de Psicología (UNC), Ciudad Universitaria, Bv. de la Reforma esquina, Enfermera Gordillo s/n, Córdoba, Argentina
  • E. Berezina
    Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • M. Björnstjerna
    Institute for Futures Studies, Box 591, Stockholm, Sweden
  • S. Blumen
    Departamento de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, San Miguel, Lima, Peru
  • P. Boski
    SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Chodakowska, Poland
  • F. Bou Zeineddine
    Department of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • I. Bovina
    Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
  • B. Huyen
    Hanoi National University of Education, Cau Giay District, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • J. Cardenas
    Universidad de los Andes, Colombia, Bogota, Colombia
  • Đ. Čekrlija
    Faculty of philosophy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • H. Choi
    Department of Psychology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • C. Contreras-Ibáñez
    Departamento de Sociología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - Unidad Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • R. Costa-Lopes
    Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • M. de Barra
    Center for Culture and Evolution, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
  • P. de Zoysa
    Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
  • A. Dorrough
    Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • N. Dvoryanchikov
    Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia
  • A. Eller
    Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Av. Universidad 3004, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, Mexico
  • J. Engelmann
    Center for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision Making (CREED), Amsterdam School of Economics, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15867, Amsterdam, NJ, The Netherlands
  • H. Euh
    Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 55455, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • X. Fang
    Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • S. Fiedler
    Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany
  • O. Foster-Gimbel
    New York University, Stern School of Business, 10012, New York, NY, USA
  • M. Fülöp
    Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre of Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary, Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Budapest, Hungary
  • R. Gardarsdottir
    Department of Psychology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
  • C. Gill
    Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • A. Glöckner
    Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany
  • S. Graf
    Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
  • A. Grigoryan
    Department of Personality Psychology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia
  • V. Gritskov
    Saint Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia
  • K. Growiec
    SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Chodakowska, Poland
  • P. Halama
    Center for Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • A. Hartanto
    School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore
  • T. Hopthrow
    School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
  • M. Hřebíčková
    Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
  • D. Iliško
    Daugavpils University, Daugvapils, Latvia
  • H. Imada
    School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
  • H. Kapoor
    Department of Psychology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • K. Kawakami
    Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • N. Khachatryan
    Department of Personality Psychology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia
  • N. Kharchenko
    Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • N. Khoury
    Future Minds Gifted Centre, Lima, Peru
  • T. Kiyonari
    Aoyama Gakuin University, Sagamihara-city, Kanagawa, Japan
  • M. Kohút
    Faculty of Philosophy and Arts, University of Trnava, Trnava, Slovakia
  • L. Linh
    National Economics University, Hai Ba Trung, Dong Tam District, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • L. Leslie
    New York University, Stern School of Business, 10012, New York, NY, USA
  • Y. Li
    Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, Melbourne School of Psychological Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
  • N. Li
    School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore
  • Z. Li
    Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
  • K. Liik
    School of Natural Sciences and Health, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia
  • A. Maitner
    Department of International Studies, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • B. Manhique
    Eduardo Mondlane University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Department of Sociology, Maputo, Mozambique
  • H. Manley
    Faculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • I. Medhioub
    Department of Finance and Investment, Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), P.O. Box 5701, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • S. Mentser
    The Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel
  • L. Mohammed
    Institute of Criminology and Public Safety, Valsayn Campus, Graver Road, Valsayn, University of Trinidad and Tobago, Arima, Trinidad and Tobago
  • P. Nejat
    Department of Psychology and Education, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  • O. Nipassa
    Eduardo Mondlane University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Department of Sociology, Maputo, Mozambique
  • R. Nussinson
    The Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
  • N. Onyedire
    Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
  • I. Onyishi
    Department of Psychology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria
  • S. Özden
    Koç University, Rumelifeneri, Sarıyer Rumelifeneri Yolu, Istanbul, Turkey
  • P. Panagiotopoulou
    Department of Education and Social Work, University of Patras, Rion, Patras, Greece
  • L. Perez-Floriano
    Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
  • M. Persson
    Institute for Futures Studies, Box 591, Stockholm, Sweden
  • M. Pheko
    Department of Psychology, University of Botswana, Private Bag UB 00705, Gaborone, Botswana
  • A. Pirttilä-Backman
    University of Helsinki, Faculty of Social Sciences, Social Psychology, PO Box 54 (Unioninkatu 37), Helsinki, Finland
  • M. Pogosyan
    Politics, Psychology, Law and Economics (PPLE), University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15575, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • J. Raver
    Queen’s University, Goodes Hall, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
  • C. Reyna
    Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), CABA, República Argentina
  • R. Rodrigues
    Instituto Universitário de Lisboa ISCTE-IUL, CIS, Lisbon, Portugal
  • S. Romanò
    Department of Culture, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • P. Romero
    Experimental and Computational Economics Lab (ECEL), School of Economics, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Diego de Robles y Pampite, Quito, Ecuador
  • I. Sakki
    University of Eastern Finland, Department of Social Sciences, P.O. Box 162770211, Kuopio, Finland
  • A. San Martin
    IESE Business School, Madrid, Spain
  • S. Sherbaji
    Department of International Studies, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
  • H. Shimizu
    Kwansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
  • B. Simpson
    Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
  • E. Szabo
    Department of International Management, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
  • K. Takemura
    Faculty of Economics, Shiga University, Hikone, Shiga, Japan
  • H. Tieffi
    Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny Cocody-Abidjan, Centre Ivoirien d’Etude et de Recherche en Psychologie Appliquée (CIERPA), Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
  • M. Mendes Teixeira
    Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Business Administration Postgraduate Program, São Paulo, Brazil
  • N. Thanomkul
    Faculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • H. Tiliouine
    Labo-PECS, Faculty of Social Sciences, Université d’Oran 2, Oran, Algeria
  • G. Travaglino
    School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK, School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Longgang District, Shenzhen, P. R. China
  • Y. Tsirbas
    University of Athens, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Athens, Greece
  • R. Wan
    Department of International Management, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
  • S. Widodo
    Department of Personality and Social Psychology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • R. Zein
    Department of Personality and Social Psychology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Q. Zhang
    Guangzhou University, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China
  • L. Zirganou-Kazolea
    University of Athens, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Athens, Greece
  • P. Van Lange
    VU Amsterdam, Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (IBBA), Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Название журнала
  • Nature Communications
Том
  • 12
Выпуск
  • 1
Страницы
  • 1481
Издатель
  • Springer Nature
Тип документа
  • journal article
Тип лицензии Creative Commons
  • CC BY
Правовой статус документа
  • Свободная лицензия
Источник
  • dimensions