Статья

Long-term trajectories of human civilization

S. Baum, S. Armstrong, T. Ekenstedt, O. Häggström, R. Hanson, K. Kuhlemann, M. Maas, J. Miller, M. Salmela, A. Sandberg, K. Sotala, P. Torres, A. Turchin, R. Yampolskiy,
2021

Purpose: This paper aims to formalize long-term trajectories of human civilization as a scientific and ethical field of study. The long-term trajectory of human civilization can be defined as the path that human civilization takes during the entire future time period in which human civilization could continue to exist. Design/methodology/approach: This paper focuses on four types of trajectories: status quo trajectories, in which human civilization persists in a state broadly similar to its current state into the distant future; catastrophe trajectories, in which one or more events cause significant harm to human civilization; technological transformation trajectories, in which radical technological breakthroughs put human civilization on a fundamentally different course; and astronomical trajectories, in which human civilization expands beyond its home planet and into the accessible portions of the cosmos. Findings: Status quo trajectories appear unlikely to persist into the distant future, especially in light of long-term astronomical processes. Several catastrophe, technological transformation and astronomical trajectories appear possible. Originality/value: Some current actions may be able to affect the long-term trajectory. Whether these actions should be pursued depends on a mix of empirical and ethical factors. For some ethical frameworks, these actions may be especially important to pursue. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Цитирование

Похожие публикации

Документы

Источник

Версии

  • 1. Version of Record от 2021-04-27

Метаданные

Об авторах
  • S. Baum
    Global Catastrophic Risk Institute, New York, NY, United States
  • S. Armstrong
    Future of Humanity Institute, Department of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • T. Ekenstedt
    Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • O. Häggström
    Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • R. Hanson
    Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States
  • K. Kuhlemann
    Department of Political Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • M. Maas
    Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • J. Miller
    Department of Economics, Smith College, Northampton, MA, United States
  • M. Salmela
    Umeå, Sweden
  • A. Sandberg
    Foundational Research Institute, Berlin, Germany
  • K. Sotala
    Washington, DC, United States
  • P. Torres
    Science for Life Extension Foundation, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • A. Turchin
    JB Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
  • R. Yampolskiy
Название журнала
  • Foresight
Том
  • 21
Выпуск
  • 1
Страницы
  • 53-83
Издатель
  • Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Тип документа
  • journal article
Тип лицензии Creative Commons
  • CC
Правовой статус документа
  • Свободная лицензия
Источник
  • scopus