Статья

Physical rehabilitation needs in the brics nations from 1990 to 2017: Cross-national analyses using data from the global burden of disease study

T. Jesus, M. Landry, H. Hoenig, Y. Zeng, S. Kamalakannan, R. Britto, N. Pogosova, O. Sokolova, K. Grimmer, Q. Louw,
2021

Background: This study analyzes the current and evolving physical rehabilitation needs of BRICS nations (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China, South Africa), a coalition of large emergent economies increasingly important for global health. Methods: Secondary, cross-national analyses of data on Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) were extracted from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Total physical rehabilitation needs, and those stratified per major condition groups are analyzed for the year 2017 (current needs), and for every year since 1990 (evolution over time). ANOVAs are used to detect significant yearly changes. Results: Total physical rehabilitation needs have increased significantly from 1990 to 2017 in each of the BRICS nations, in every metric analyzed (YLD Counts, YLDs per 100,000 people, and percentage of YLDs relevant to physical rehabilitation; all p < 0.01). Musculoskeletal & pain conditions were leading cause of physical rehabilitation needs across the BRICS nations but to varying degrees: from 36% in South Africa to 60% in Brazil. Country-specific trends include: 25% of South African needs were from HIV-related conditions (no other BRICS nation had more than 1%); India had both absolute and relative growths of pediatric rehabilitation needs (p < 0.01); China had an exponential growth in the per-capita needs from neurological and neoplastic conditions (p < 0.01; r2 = 0.97); Brazil had a both absolute and relative growth of needs coming from musculoskeletal & pain conditions (p < 0.01); and the Russian Federation had the highest neurological rehabilitation needs per capita in 2017 (over than three times those of India, South Africa or Brazil). Conclusions: total physical rehabilitation needs have been increasing in each of the BRICS nations, both in absolute and relative values. Apart from the common growing trend, each of the BRICS nations had own patterns for the amount, typology, and evolution of their physical rehabilitation needs, which must be taken into account while planning for health and physical rehabilitation programs, policies and resources. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Цитирование

Источник

Версии

  • 1. Version of Record от 2021-04-27

Метаданные

Об авторах
  • T. Jesus
    Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM) & WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Workforce Policy and Planning, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, NOVA University of Lisbon (IHMT-UNL), Rua da Junqueira 100, Lisbon, 1349-008, Portugal
  • M. Landry
    School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States
  • H. Hoenig
    Duke Global Health Institute (DGHI), Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States
  • Y. Zeng
    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, United States
  • S. Kamalakannan
    Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
  • R. Britto
    Center for Study of Aging and Human Development and Geriatrics Division, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States
  • N. Pogosova
    National School of Development and Raissun Institute for Advanced Studies, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
  • O. Sokolova
    Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), South Asia Centre for Disability Inclusive Development and Research (SACDIR), Indian Institute of Public Health, (IIPH-H), Hyderabad, 500 033, India
  • K. Grimmer
    Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, 36036-900, Brazil
  • Q. Louw
    National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Moscow, 524901, Russian Federation
Название журнала
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Том
  • 17
Выпуск
  • 11
Страницы
  • 1-18
Ключевые слова
  • disability; disease; human immunodeficiency virus; neurology; public health; typology; Alzheimer disease; Article; autism; brain tumor; Brazil; cardiovascular disease; cerebrovascular accident; China; chronic respiratory tract disease; controlled study; dementia; disability; encephalitis; global disease burden; gout; Guillain Barre syndrome; heart failure; human; India; leprosy; low back pain; meningitis; motor neuron disease; multiple sclerosis; musculoskeletal injury; neck pain; osteoarthritis; Parkinson disease; physical rehabilitation; rehabilitation; rheumatoid arthritis; Russian Federation; South Africa; spinal cord injury; spinal cord ischemia; tension headache; tetanus; thorax injury; traumatic brain injury; years lived with disability; Zika fever; child; epidemiology; Brazil; China; India; Russian Federation; South Africa; Brazil; Child; China; Global Burden of Disease; Humans; India; Russia; South Africa
Издатель
  • MDPI AG
Тип документа
  • journal article
Тип лицензии Creative Commons
  • CC
Правовой статус документа
  • Свободная лицензия
Источник
  • scopus